You can export a RAW file from Lightroom. If you feed it an ISO 3200 file, it probably expects that file to contain pristine ISO 3200 noise. No it's just a more sophisticated form of interpolation. With Topaz Denoise, seeing as the best result is achieved with the RAW import option, and that import is based on a camera specific profile, I wouldnt dick around with the RAW information before import. What the Topaz system does (certainly in Topaz Detail so I assume here too) is analyse the detail in the original at different levels so it can bring out the real detail rather than producing 'detail where none existed before'. I can go over a picture with a pencil and add detail that's not in the original but that's false detail. technology can often provide better results than non-A.I. But until somebody invents a time machine so we can go back in time and reshoot scenes with better equipment than we originally used, many of us are trying to produce the best quality we can from old images that already exist. With all this said, yes, starting out with higher quality files does produce better quality. Gigapixel processed images because the skies look too perfect. Enough that some people add artificial noise to A.I. Gigapixel itself does a lot of auto-healing to blotchy clear skies. Mmm, let's wait for actual reviews, not speculation based on limited understanding of the technology that is under the hood. and jpegs lose a lot on their way from the sensor. 'Interpolation' really doesn't apply to Topaz's A.I. Topaz's Artificial Intelligence can (in many cases) produce detail where none existed before.

Gigapixel when it was released last year. I haven't tried this product but I spent a lot of time testing A.I. Software can guess at or interpolate data but if it aint there to begin with The old saying “garbage in equals garbage out” really applies here. You could call it a image converter, as that’s all it provides. I look forward to seeing some comparison tests. Topaz JPEG to RAW AI has a very simple interface. But can't most decent phones now shoot RAW? That would certainly be useful since in-phone processing is generally bad. I see, a function designed to un-do the in-camera processing of cell phones. software for transforming your JPEGs into RAW files, what used to be impossible is now possible. It's the next best thing to having your trusty camera gear on hand! With JPEG to RAW AI, you can prevent banding, remove compression artifacts, recover detail, and enhance dynamic range. Cutting edge noise reduction algorithm Preserves and enhances detail Batch mode RAW and DNG file support Multiple AI models for different cases Chat. Ever come across the perfect shot and all you had was your phone? Now you can take the shot, then take your compressed JPEG image and convert it to RAW in Topaz JPEG to RAW AI. Topaz JPEG to RAW A I uses machine learning to do what was previously impossible: turn JPEGs into high-quality RAWs for a better editing experience. This is a snippet from the advertising e-mail that I received from them: Why would anyone even would want a RAW file created from the limited data in an existing jpeg? Help me understand. As I was getting ready to submit this article, Topaz released Photo AI 3.0. Even if it can save as various RAW file types (Nikon desktop software has been able to do that for many years), it will be nothing at all like having the original RAW data from the camera.

Topaz jpeg to raw ai review